Communist Website Links

Comment

Comment by Rhonda Granger on November 28, 2011 at 6:54pm

 

http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5V4oqr5iP-g

Here's the video with Judge Napalotano, not sure if I should trust it. Mox news put it out, ya know... unfair and biased. Yeah, it's kinda hard to trust a news sourse with that as their slogan, but it fits.

Comment by Rhonda Granger on November 28, 2011 at 6:28pm

http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o276WIlU21E

Maybe it's just propoganda, but I also seen a video with Andrew Napalotano saying that the president is considering holding a prisoner on Gitmo, even after they've been aquitted. I'm not sure how true that one is, I'll see if I can find that one too.

Comment by Rhonda Granger on November 28, 2011 at 6:09pm

http://http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/senators-demand-m... S1867 . I read the summary, but didn't see anything in there about this, or maybe I just don't underestand the language. I seen a video on you tube about this,  When I find the video, I'll post it.

Comment by W on October 4, 2011 at 8:20am

It looks like they may have done that bill right after the 2008 crisis. They know the American people will be pissed when they find out the trillions that have been stolen. Aprox. 22 trillion since 1992. God help us!

Comment by Rhonda Granger on October 3, 2011 at 7:25pm

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12793

Go to the library of congress, do an advanced search, for 111th congress and search bill number HR645. It's probably all conspiracy theory, but it does sound like FEMA internment camps.

Comment by W on September 21, 2011 at 9:36pm

LOL...yup definitely a rebel, although I hope you were joking about whites and darks. I used to live with someone who wanted to control the dish organization in the washer. I'm very happy that is out of my life now.

 

The language is tough in these bills, but that is usually a big red flag that they are purposely trying to hide their agenda. Like we expected any different from BHO and his Marxist/Leninist team...

 

Try and think of something enjoyable and get your mind off the ugly for a while.  :-)

Comment by Rhonda Granger on September 20, 2011 at 6:36pm

Thanx Walt. I really wish I knew how to understand this type of language.I don't think I'm totally stupid, I am able to figure stuff out, but you need a college degree to understand this. Good to know you don't take points off for spelling. I have fbf that will... Well pardon freaking me!  Anyway, that pdf is real long, and it shouldn't be. government don't create jobs, just more government. So he probably threw stuff in there that was left out of obamacare. So he's gonna control the jobs market as well as the health care, what's left? Maybe the food supply, oh wait... they're working on that one too. O.K. I'm totally depressed now, so I'm gonna load the dishwasher, it won't cheer me up, but at least I can decide where to put the stupid dishes in it, no one can tell me how to do that, and when I do laundry, I won't seperate the whites from the dark! I'm such a rebel!

 

Comment by W on September 20, 2011 at 1:16pm

Lol! Spelling is no worry from me. i cast no judgements since i use spell check almost 100% of the time. Its odd....I found an article that agrees with us that i just posted in blogs. (Spell Check is even wrong some of the time).

CLICK HERE TO READ

I emailed this to several friends with your PDF so they might see the language and how Obama plans to screw us all again.

Comment by Rhonda Granger on September 20, 2011 at 1:11pm

The main reason I put it here was so we could take our tr and go over it. Some rabble rousers are saying it takes away state sovrenty ( don't know how to spell that word ) . If it was written in Dr. Seuss form, I'd understand it alot easier.

Comment by W on September 20, 2011 at 11:50am

I have skimmed over it somewhat. I will be more thorough over the next few days as I will have time to read it and take notes. I haven't noticed any property issues in the sec 376 but maybe it is somewhere close to that point.

 

I did notice, what looks like this bill giving the president power to bypass congress on certain issues (Possibly). I also noticed that it uses several lines granting powers to his cabinet members while limiting the protections of states rights.

 

There are also several references to the Civil Rights act of 1964.

 

Part of what I read makes it illegal for businesses to advertise inhouse-only job openings, as if it would be law to hire from outside the company.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• …
• 6
• Next ›
• Page